It’s been almost a year since my last update, so it’s high time I let you know how my chess is going. I’ve been concentrating on studying programming at 42 in Paris so haven’t had a huge amount of time to dedicate to chess. Still, I hit a new peak rating of 2096 in January, and think I am improving gradually in areas such as time management and ‘sitzfleisch’. By way of an example I give the following recent highlight:
[Event "London Classic Weekend Open"]
[Site "London Olympia"]
[Date "2018.12.16"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Taylor, Will"]
[Black "Murphy, Conor"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B40"]
[WhiteElo "2078"]
[BlackElo "2331"]
[Annotator "will"]
[PlyCount "121"]
[EventDate "2018.??.??"]
[SourceVersionDate "2018.10.11"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. b3 {Normally I play mainlines, but I have struggled
against the e6 Sicilian and so experimented with a number of different options.
} b6 4. Bd3 {As played by Kasparov once in a blitz event in St Louis.} Bb7 5.
O-O Nc6 (5... Nf6 6. e5 Nd5 7. Be4 Qc7 8. Re1 Be7 9. Bb2 b5 10. Na3 a6 11. c4
bxc4 12. Nxc4 O-O 13. d4 Nf4 14. Qd2 Bxe4 15. Rxe4 Nd5 16. dxc5 Qxc5 17. Rg4
Kh8 18. Ng5 Nc6 19. Ne4 Qa7 20. Rd1 a5 21. Nf6 Nxe5 22. Nxd5 Nxg4 23. Nxe7 f6
24. Nd6 a4 25. h3 Nh6 26. b4 Qb6 27. Rc1 a3 28. Ba1 Rab8 29. Rc4 Qd8 30. Nec8
Nf5 31. Qc2 Nxd6 32. Nxd6 Qe7 33. Qd3 e5 34. b5 Qe6 35. Qxa3 Qd5 36. Rc1 Ra8
37. Qb4 Rxa2 38. Bc3 h6 39. b6 Ra6 40. Rb1 Rb8 41. b7 Qxd6 {0-1 (41) Kasparov,
G (2812)-So,W (2773) Saint Louis 2016}) 6. Re1 Be7 7. Bb2 Nf6 8. e5 Nh5 9. Bf1
g6 $146 10. Nc3 f6 11. Ne4 O-O 12. g3 $6 {Restricting the h5-knight and
preparing to improve my light-squared bishop, but this allows Black to seize
the initiative with a nice series of moves.} fxe5 13. Nxe5 Nf6 $6 (13... Nxe5
14. Bxe5 d6 15. Bb2 d5 16. Nc3 Bf6 $15 {Black’s central control gives him a
slight advantage.}) 14. Bg2 Qc7 15. Nxc6 Bxc6 16. Nxf6+ Bxf6 17. Bxf6 Rxf6 18.
Bxc6 Qxc6 {This position is very simplified and still equal. In the past
reaching a position like this against such a strong player (my opponent earned
a GM norm in his next event) would have paralysed me, but I managed to control
my nerves and keep playing quite quickly while my opponent burnt time looking
for a way to complicate matters.} 19. d4 Rf3 20. c4 Raf8 21. Re2 a5 22. Rb1 {
[%cal Ga1b1,Gb1b2,Gb2d2] The start of quite a pleasing rook manoeuvre.} R8f7
23. Rbb2 Kf8 $6 {A step in the wrong direction.} 24. Rbd2 cxd4 25. Rxd4 Ke8 $2
{Continuing with his bad plan and allowing a stroke which gives me a
technically winning rook ending. Sometimes playing quickly and solidly against
stronger players can bring success if their search for complications results
in incorrect play.} 26. Rd6 $1 {I was alert enough to spot this as despite my
solid play I had always been looking for opportunities of my own.} Qc7 27. Qd4
Qc5 28. Qxc5 bxc5 29. Ra6 {This rook ending still presents some difficulties
in conversion, but I was helped by the time situation – I had 30 minutes to
his 5. Historically the vast majority of my games have featured my opponents
with a time advantage; going forward I will try to have more games like this!}
Kd8 30. Rxa5 R7f5 31. Rb5 Kc7 32. a4 Rd3 33. Ra2 Rd6 34. Kg2 h5 35. h3 Rc6 36.
a5 Rf8 37. a6 Ra8 38. a7 d6 39. b4 cxb4 40. Rxb4 Rb6 41. Rba4 Kc6 42. Ra6 Kb7
43. R6a4 Kc6 44. Kf3 Kc5 45. Rd2 Kc6 46. Kf4 d5 47. cxd5+ exd5 48. Ra5 Rb7 49.
Raxd5 Rbxa7 50. Rd6+ Kc5 51. Rxg6 h4 52. gxh4 Ra3 53. Rg3 R3a4+ 54. Kf3 Rxh4
55. Rg5+ Kc6 56. Kg2 Ra3 57. Rg3 Raa4 58. Rc3+ Kb5 59. Rb2+ Rab4 60. Rxb4+ Kxb4
61. Rc8 1-0
You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess game visualization.
On the other hand, I am still more than capable of having disastrous games. At the last 4NCL weekend I wasn’t in the right frame of mind for playing chess, and so tried to finish both games quickly. The result was the following car crash of a game and a marginally better effort the following day accompanied by a rating loss of 20 points.
[Event "West is Best 2 vs Wessex A, bd. 4"]
[Site "London Olympia"]
[Date "2019.01.12"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Taylor, Will"]
[Black "McDougall, William"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B85"]
[WhiteElo "2096"]
[BlackElo "2080"]
[Annotator "will"]
[PlyCount "50"]
[EventDate "2018.??.??"]
[SourceVersionDate "2018.10.11"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be2 e6 7. Be3 Be7 8. O-O
(8. f4 O-O 9. g4 {was played in So-Grandelius (0-1) in the recently concluded
Gibraltar tournament. Delaying castling like this might be a better move order
if I want to go for this plan.}) 8... O-O 9. f4 Nc6 10. g4 {[%cal Gg4g5,Ge2d3,
Gd1h5,Gf1f3,Gf3h3,Gh5h7] As mentioned, I wanted to finish the game quickly, so
went for this rather speculative attack. I have won numerous online blitz
games with the plan g5, Bd3, Qh5, Rf3-h3 and a quick mate, but this plan is
less appropriate for classical time controls.} Re8 11. f5 $2 {[%csl Ge5]
Another psychological (and objective) mistake. I saw that after 11.g5 Nd7 my
planned attack with Bd3 and Qh5 would not be possible, as after 12.Bd3 Nxd4 13.
Bxd4 e5 14.Be3 exf4 15. Bxf4 Bxg5 the g-pawn hangs. That means 12.h4 is
necessary, but that spoils my intended h-file hack and somehow felt too
‘all-in’. A strange thing to say given that I have already pushed the g-pawn,
I know!} (11. g5 Nd7 12. h4 (12. Bd3 $2 Nxd4 13. Bxd4 e5 14. Be3 exf4 15. Bxf4
Bxg5)) 11... Nxd4 12. Qxd4 Nd7 13. Rad1 Ne5 14. Qb6 {Continuing the change of
direction started by 11.f5 – after starting off playing for mate, I now want
to play an ending! I thought the exchange of queens on b6 would be good for me
as d6 would be weak (a correct assessment), but of course this is not forced.}
Bd7 15. Qxb7 $6 {Black gets too much play now.} Rb8 16. Qxa6 Rxb2 17. a4 {
Deciding to play more ambitiously, but I calculated too superficially here –
the queen is in trouble.} ({When I grabbed on b7 I had intended} 17. Qa3 {
, when objectively Black is considerably better but in a game between humans
all three results are possible.}) 17... Bc8 18. Qa7 Nc6 19. Qa8 Qd7 {I had
missed this move.} 20. Bb5 Bb7 21. Bxc6 (21. fxe6 $1 fxe6 22. Qa5 {would have
allowed me to keep playing, although I am still much worse after} Qc8 (22...
Bd8 23. Bxc6 Bxc6 24. Qa7) 23. Bxc6 Bxc6 {because of my poor coordination.} ({
Opening the f-file proves useful on} 23... Qxc6 {when I have} 24. Qh5 {with
some counterplay.})) (21. Qa5 {immediately is not the same – after} Bd8 22.
Bxc6 Qxc6 {I can resign.}) 21... Qxc6 22. Qa7 Bf6 23. Nb5 Qxe4 24. Rd2 {
It’s all over anyway, so why not allow mate?} Qxg4+ 25. Kf2 Bh4# 0-1
You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess game visualization.
My current efforts to limp over the 2100 mark remind me of my mindset after I passed 2000 for the first time: I was very keen not to drop below 2000 and so made some conservative decisions, with the result that I slowly bled points down to around 1950. At that point I set my sights on the 2100 mark , after which my rating started going in the right direction again, eventually reaching 2091 in December 2016, up from 1957 in September 2015. That’s a simplified version of what happened, of course, but I think it’s time to try something similar again, so my target is now 2200 by 25 January 2020. The secondary goal is to post more often than last year, which shouldn’t be too difficult.
Wishing you all chess success, and a happy and prosperous Year of the Pig!